User:Winhunter
Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.
| Languages | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Search user languages |
| Userbox | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Search user languages |
| No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Articles I...
[edit]Created
[edit]- Nationality Law of the People's Republic of China
- Higher education in Hong Kong (Translated)
- Hong Kong Institute of Vocational Education (Translated)
- Learn from Dazhai in agriculture
- University Grants Committee
Expanded significantly
[edit]My other accounts
[edit]- WinBot (BRFA · contribs · actions log · block log · flag log · user rights)
- Winpublic (talk · contribs · count) (For use in public computers)
My bookmarks
[edit]
Administrative backlog
[edit]Reports
[edit]- 78.3.61.244 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1321 (LTA 1321, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 14:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Smatteo499 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 1311 (LTA 1311, details). Note: Please see the comment(s) at the top of filter 1311 before taking any action. Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Direstrait20198765 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 16:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
False positive. Edits are not vandalism. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:20, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- 2001:BB6:C551:4300:3524:F937:FD76:A44B (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Persistent disruptive editing across multiple articles. Magitroopa (talk) 14:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Harrier Safari (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. Disruptive editing and unsourced content addition to all edits done by the user. Wikibear47 (talk) 15:49, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Edits are not vandalism. Please ensure recent edits constitute vandalism before re-reporting. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:02, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Haroonshaik (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – On Ghousavi Shah: Clear case of WP:NOTHERE. The user has been posting non-neutral/promotional-sounding content on Ghousavi Shah, and going directly against multiple embedded notes. They are also displaying WP:OWN behavior, at one point even self-proclaiming to be "the admin of this article". While their most recent edit isn't WP:OWN behavior, they added more unsourced content after receiving a final warning. Apologies if this is better suited for somewhere else, but reporting here since it seems like a pretty clear cut case of WP:NOTHERE to me. Katniss May the odds be ever in your favor ♥ 16:19, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- 2604:3D08:187C:9600:25B2:1BF0:7728:8E8E (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Alice in Wonderland (1951 film) (diff): vandalism after recent release of block. Resumed on /64 range. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
User-reported
[edit]- Fasttrackconsultancy (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. BusterD (talk) 10:45, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Bharat Krishi Vikas Pariyojna (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Being used for promotion on the talk page. ScrabbleTiles (talk) 11:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- LittleDiaperfag (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as an offensive and disruptive username. May be interpreted as "little diaper fag". it's lio! | talk | work 13:56, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Gau Bharat Bharati (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. See website: https://gaubharatbharati.com/. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:34, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
 | This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared. |
Current requests for increase in protection level
[edit]Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or, failing that, the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Not all recent IP edits are clearly bad faith. Entranced98 (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – More IP editors persistently re-adding unsourced and sometimes outright fake endorsements, and party policy positions three or more years out of date, which have been repeatedly reverted. Has been slow but ongoing since last protection was lifted. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:47, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ongoing block evasion and addition of unsourced content; page recently unprotected but now subject to same disruptive editing after end of block. ser! (chat to me - see my edits) 15:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing by anonymous editor(s). livelikemusic (TALK!) 15:23, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: High level of IP vandalism by different IP's who edit the same racist additions. Currently it is 182.0.205.13 Bklynculture (talk) 02:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- (Non-administrator comment) Presumably the intended page is Bensonhurst, Brooklyn (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and not the given redirect. I don't really see the need to protect the page just yet given the rate of disruption so far, and it will not stop the user responsible since they are actively disrupting a numerous other articles with fake demographic information their recent edits have now largely been reverted on known ranges If I were still active and had the time I would actively recommend holding off for the moment to gather more data and lock down some patterns and ranges using a known repeat target. However I don't have the time these years to actively monitor this or really any pages, and especially not in the coming month. If someone else wants to take this on fine, otherwise it can be protected but it's unlikely to reduce disruption to any significant degree. 184.152.65.118 (talk) 03:48, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined per IP. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dietricht Borgenland (talk) 05:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. - it looks like just one sock account has targeted that page. That isn't really enough to warrant ECP which would otherwise be warranted. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent vandalism from IP users. Hotwiki (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 12:59, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Sockpuppetry. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dietricht. Borgenland (talk) 05:06, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: Itacolomy (talk · contribs) blocked by PhilKnight. Materialscientist (talk) 13:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Janhrach (talk) 08:16, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. No vandalism since April 3. * Pppery * it has begun... 14:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Not respecting race lap record information. Island92 (talk) 11:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Repeated unsourced original research and misinformation from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 13:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP keeps removing sourced information. The Banner talk 15:14, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – IP removing sourced information. The Banner talk 15:15, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Vandalism 80.249.92.149 (talk) 20:13, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 20:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: BLP, high profile, in the news because of criminal case, currently attracting significant vandalism. PatGallacher (talk) 20:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Persistent addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:54, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: IP vandalism. Jfect22 (talk) 03:21, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry; LTA harassment 24.55.33.220 (talk) 04:16, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Materialscientist (talk) 12:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
@Materialscientist I'm just letting you know vandalism has came back to disruptive this page please protect this page. 47.21.51.146 (talk) 16:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – Edit warring. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 04:17, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – Unsourced and unhelpful edits. Need to be protected for longer period than previous time. Mehedi Abedin 06:29, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 3 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 13:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: @Materialscientist: One or more pages in this request have not been protected.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Unsourced changes to date of birth, which has yet to be verified via a reliable secondary source. Mellamelina (talk) 11:46, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: people have been vandalizing it every since I published it it was my first draft and I wish it be protected Opproductions (talk) 12:38, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Not done Wikipedia is not for things made up one day. Your draft has zero chance of being published. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:27, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: It could be vandalized by Turkish people who hate Kurdistan regionKurdiz (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. We don't preemptively protect articles because they "could be" vandalized. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edit warring from IP users. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 14:00, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: disruptive editing. Kajmer05 (talk) 14:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent edits by one IP editor who ignores page policy, using IPs 70.51.9.16 and 2605:b100:506:1bf3:60a6:78f0:39b5:14fe. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Need semi-protection from possibly more drive-by editors who have no consensus for their edits. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Reason: Due to severe ethnic sabotage. Mohammadmehdimirzaii (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Multiple attempts by IP editors to whitewash article, remove sourced content. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
[edit]Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Reason: Because there is no reason for the semi-protection in the first place. 2601:243:2100:5AC0:FCC5:E5D5:2ECC:2C86 (talk) 03:58, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Comment:: Page history seems to say otherwise. Sumanuil. (talk to me) 04:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Sergecross73: Pinging the protecting admin. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:13, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
- I watched over the page for over a decade. It's a magnet for problematic edits. I'm not opposed if someone feels strongly, but it almost certainly be re-upped again for bad edits. There are many editors who maintain it these days though, so there are people to assist. Sergecross73 msg me 13:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
[edit]Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
[edit]A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
| 1 protected edit request | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 21:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 17:10, 6 April 2025 (UTC) |
WP:RFA
|
WP:PERM
| Requests for autopatrolled |
|---|
Autopatrolled[edit]
Reason for requesting autopatrolled rights Can I have autopatrolled rights re granted, as they have now expired? Thank you! SDGB1217 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor on the English Wikipedia since 2017 and have created over 100 articles. Being autopatrolled will reduce the backlog on articles needing reviews. Thanks for the consideration. SuperSwift (talk) 19:10, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Prolific creator of biography articles who appears to understand the notability guidelines. My random selection of articles they had recently created showed no other issues of note, though I would recommend they create associated talk pages for their work. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access |
|---|
AutoWikiBrowser[edit]
Citation and grammar edits Czarking0 (talk) 04:49, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
I'm currently working on some general maintenance of articles related to the theory of general relativity and would like some extra tools for automatic syntax fixing, etc. Some articles like this one could use some semi-automated tender love and care. A recent rewrite I did here might improve with some finishing touches too. ScienceDawns (talk) 08:44, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
I feel like I've improved as an editor since my rights were revoked in July 2024 (due to a long series of impulsive mistakes I made and not checking my work hard enough), and since I last tried to apply in November 2024. I've tried slowing down on the editing, especially with Rater, as Pppery pointed out. Anyway, the main reason why I wanted to reapply for AWB is because cleaning up Category:Pages using infobox Russian inhabited locality with unknown parameters has been rather tedious; I recently found a bunch of unnecessary parameters (most notably, "date") that I believe can be removed more efficiently if I had access to the application. However, I will try to remove parameters (or use AWB in general) as a last resort (like if the params are truly redundant), and instead try to fix them if possible. OpalYosutebito (talk) 02:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting access to AWB to help me efficiently fix typos and clean up articles that I find with the "random article" button. AllCatsAreGrey (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
can I use AutoWikiBrowser on the English Wikipedia. ਰਵੀ ਸਹਿਗਲ (talk) 05:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
It is to following things in malayalam wikipedia such as correct common typos and grammatical errors, Standardizing article formatting and layout and Updating outdated links and references. Akbarali (talk) 03:51, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use AutoWikiBrowser for adding wikilinks to articles. I might also use it for fixing typos. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 04:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to use AutoWikiBrowser to edit Wikipedia and help fix minor and major errors with automated programming, I feel like I could do a lot more with it than just regular editing. Valorrr (talk) 21:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Use regular expressions to find and replace wikitext on football club season articles, in order to comply with MOS:FLAG Microwave Anarchist (talk) 19:30, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I want to get into rewriting articles more (most of my edits are vandalism reverting and PCR) AWB, will be able to help me make larger and accurate contributions, with great speed. I understand many en-Wikipedia policies through RCP and have gathered the privilege of rollback and pending changes reviewing through my several hundred contributions. Thanks and happy editing! twisted. (user | talk | contribs) 18:05, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for extended confirmation |
|---|
Extended confirmed[edit]
I had my EC revoked last year by the arbitration committee. I have since completed the required 500 substantial edits to the best of my knowledge. I applied about a month ago and was refused because I didn't clearly understand the requirements. But hopefully this time I got it correctly. Tashmetu (talk) 13:58, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
I had my ECP revoked 5 months ago. Since then, I've made hundreds of meaningful edits and currently have 806 edits. IdanST (talk) 18:16, 7 March 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for event coordinator |
|---|
Event coordinator[edit]
I am a librarian who will be running an editathon for my small liberal arts college on April 3rd and 4th from 9-4:30 PM. This is the third year we have done this, but I am new to the position and the event. Let me know if you need any other information from me. Librarian Daireon (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for new page reviewer |
|---|
New page reviewer[edit]
I am reapplying for the new page reviewer role after my initial request was declined because now I realize I had applied prematurely. Since then, I have gained some experience, refined my understanding of Wikipedia’s policies, and have been actively contributing to the Articles for Creation (AfC) review process. This has not only strengthened my ability to assess new articles but has also given me useful experience in engaging constructively with editors. I am well-versed with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly regarding notability, verifiability, and neutrality. My strength is my ability to remain unbiased while reviewing, and I always strive to improve by learning from my mistakes. Though my registered account is only a few months old, I have been editing Wikipedia for a long time, which has given me substantial familiarity with its norms and regulations. I have been enjoying reviewing AfC drafts, and this experience has encouraged me to take on a more active role in maintaining Wikipedia’s quality. I now feel myself confident that I can handle this responsibility and would greatly appreciate the opportunity to contribute as a new page reviewer. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Rahmatula786 (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
I would like to request NPR rights to contribute more effectively to this area and help reduce the backlog at NPP. I have created 18 articles and have been actively involved in patrolling new pages, tagging non-notable and promotional content for CSD and AfD. Many of the articles I have nominated for CSD or AfD have been deleted, which I believe reflects my understanding of Wikipedia's notability and content policies. With NPR rights, I will be able to continue this work more efficiently. I am familiar with relevant guidelines and policies and would appreciate the opportunity to help out in this area. Thanks for your time and consideration! Junbeesh (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
I've been an editor for a while and have experience in article creation (mainly on the shorter side for more niche areas with fewer sources) and have a few DYKs under my belt. Think my knowledge of policy demonstrated through this makes me a good fit for these permissions. Upjav (talk) 20:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
I wish to apply for New Page Reviewer permissions to deal with the large backlog of unreviewed pages. I have participated in many AfD discussions, which proves my understanding of Wikipedia's content policies and notability guidelines. JustARandomEditor123 (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am a quite experienced Wikipedia editor and pending changes reviewer; I may contribute in this field as well. Itemirus (talk) 15:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have significant experience patrolling new pages from years ago. I have re-familiarized myself with content policies and would like to resume. — yutsi (talk) 01:58, 19 March 2025 (UTC)
I am requesting this permission because I want to volunteer in reducing the NPP backlog and ensuring that new pages are encyclopedic and properly cited. I believe that I am qualified to be a new page reviewer because I have created many new articles that are encyclopedic and adequately sourced, nominated new pages for speedy deletion when appropriate and have participated in the AfD process. Cyrobyte (talk) 00:09, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
I have temporary NPP right which will expire in few days, I kindly request renewal of this right to continue reviewing articles. Thank you. Mekomo (talk) 14:33, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, explaining briefly: I would like to be able to contribute in this area. Thanks in advance. JacktheBrown (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
I am an AFC reviewer asking for another trial or permanent permission for this flag. Last time, it was granted by @Sohom Datta: for a 2-month trial after the first month trial was successful. ☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔) 04:37, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I would like to request the New Page Reviewer user right. I have been actively contributing to Wikipedia since May 2022 and have made a variety of edits, including content creation, copyediting, and reverting vandalism. I have also patrolled recent changes and worked on improving articles related to history, Type 1 diabetes, and various general topics. Additionally, I understand Wikipedia's notability guidelines, reliable sourcing requirements, and article layout conventions. I am familiar with the CSD and AfC, as well as most other things. Thank you for considering my request. MallardTV Talk to me! 03:41, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I’d like to request NPR right for a 45 day trial. I’m familiar with key policy WP:N, WP:V, WP:NPOV, and deletion criteria, CSD, PROD, & AfD. I want to test myself with this role and help reduce the backlog by reviewing new pages carefully and in line with Wiki guidelines. Oxiyam.Primal (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for page mover |
|---|
Page mover[edit]
I'm an experienced editor with years of history on Wikipedia and I've recently been getting more into page moving (mostly to fix disambiguation-related issues). The issue is that increasingly I see that a redirect already exists at the intended destination, so it would be very helpful for me to have the page mover permission so I can resolve these issues efficiently. I have moved over 500 pages so far and have initiated several requested moves as well. I don't intend to engage in any controversial moves and if any of mine are contested I'll immediately revert and go to RM. Thanks, Habst (talk) 18:11, 1 April 2025 (UTC) |
| Requests for pending changes reviewer |
|---|
Pending changes reviewer[edit]
I've been editing for a long time and understand Wikipedia's policies and goals. I especially like to help out at pages which have a lot of enthusiastic edits by knowledgeable people who might not understand Wikipedia's format and goals, making them perfect candidates for pending changes protection. I think pending changes reviewer rights would be the perfect way to help separate the wheat from the chaff and help our newest editors participate and make a difference while maintaining our high standards. Bruhpedia (talk) 20:52, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
I need the Pending changes right, I patrol through serval articles on Wikipedia Atimes I’m experienced, without much been said, I want to support. Chippla360 (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
I have read the WP:PCCRITERIA and I believe that I meet them. I sometimes see pending edits waiting for approval on articles, and I believe that I could do this job myself. wojtekpolska1013 [talk page] 09:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
I have encountered instances where the ability to review pending changes to articles would prove useful in the prevention of vandalism and would help changes in good faith be accepted more quickly. Having the pending changes reviewer right would allow me to assist new editors with learning the formatting and customs of Wikipedia, and allow me to more effectively prevent vandalism and disruption to articles. I have read all policy regarding the pending changes reviewer right. Thank you for your consideration. wafflerrs talk! 02:49, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
I have been active on Wikipedia, I'd like to request PCR to monitor recent changes. I'm aware of WP:NOTVANDAL & WP:AGF, so there won't be any "biting newcomers" reverts. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 14:40, 5 April 2025 (UTC)
|
| Requests for rollback |
|---|
Rollback[edit]
I'm requesting rollback rights to speed up my fight against vandalism. I have about 1,000 edits involving reverting vandalism. I'm also interested in tools such as AntiVandal. TheM1sty (talk) 17:49, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
I have taken up patrolling recent changes and clear vandalism prevension / sourceless BLP-edits in en-wiki too. I have enough experience of the tool through fi-wiki, where I am a rollbacker, pending changes reviewer and ”page stabilzer” (I think the group closest to it here was called editor?). I know I have under 200 edits too now, but my interest at the time here is vandalism prevention which is hard and takes multiple edits (causes spam in recent changes) without rollback-tool. I would ask for sysops to look at my well trusted global status and experience. Thank you! Osmo Lundell (talk) 20:33, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
Hi, I am requesting rollback rights to help combat vandalism and disruptive edits more effectively. I have been patrolling recent changes for the past 30 days, focusing on identifying and reverting vandalism, test edits, and other unconstructive changes. I am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies, including WP:VANDALISM, WP:BLP, and WP:NPOV. I really wanted to improve Wikipedia by my small contribution. I understand the importance of using rollback responsibly. This permission would allow me to respond more efficiently to inappropriate edits. I want to also say that I made some silly mistakes in the starting of my patrolling. However, I learnt from them and make sure that they won't happen again. Such as reverting edits that are already reverted, that mistakes you can see on my past contributions. Thank you for considering my request. Please let me know if any additional information is needed. ⚡ VortexPhantom • Talk 07:35, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
I would like to use rollback perms to more effectively fight vandals on Wikipedia, I am hoping to use Huggle to do this. 𝕟𝕪𝕖𝕦𝕓𝕚𝕞 (talk) 18:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC) |
| There are no outstanding requests for template editor. |
|---|
Template editor[edit] |
Immediate requests
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Wikipedians looking for help | 0 |
| Requests for unblock | 57 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages | 0 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations | 1 |
| Candidates for speedy deletion | 9 |
| Wikipedia fully protected edit requests | 1 |
Deletion
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Articles for deletion | 626 |
| Templates for deletion | 75 |
| Categories for deletion | 160 |
| Wikipedia files for discussion | 31 |
| All redirects for discussion | 400 |
| Miscellaneous pages for deletion | 42 |
| Possible copyright violations | 28 |
| All articles proposed for deletion | 229 |
| All files proposed for deletion | 76 |
| Unsorted AfD debates | 2 |
| All files with the same name on Commons | 37 |
Image copyright problems
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Orphaned non-free use | 356 |
| Unknown copyright status | 31 |
| Unknown source | 10 |
| No non-free use rationale | 0 |
| Replaceable non-free use images | 13 |
| Disputed non-free use images | 23 |
Page protection
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Protected | 10 |
| Semi-protected user and user talk pages | 1,278 |
| Fully protected user and user talk pages | 452 |
| Protected against vandalism | 4 |
| Protected talk pages of blocked users | 34 |
| Semi-protected | 2,291 |
| Arbitration 500/30 restricted | 0 |
Cleanup
[edit]|
General cleanup | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| All pages needing cleanup | 34,207 | 0.49 |
| All articles needing rewrite | 6,254 | 0.09 |
| All articles needing expert attention | 1,345 | 0.02 |
| All Wikipedia articles in need of updating | 40,943 | 0.59 |
|
Reference problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All pages needing factual verification | 11,482 | 0.16 |
| All articles with unsourced statements | 543,660 | 7.79 |
| All articles lacking sources | 65,885 | 0.94 |
| All unreferenced BLPs | 10 | 0 |
| All articles needing additional references | 481,399 | 6.9 |
| All articles needing references cleanup | 4,664 | 0.07 |
| All articles lacking in-text citations | 106,042 | 1.52 |
| All articles with dead external links | 286,329 | 4.1 |
|
Image cleanup problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| Image files for cleanup | 17 | - |
| Wikipedia files lacking a description | 128 | - |
| Wikipedia files with unknown source | 16 | - |
|
Other problems | ||
| Category | Entries | Percentage |
| All articles to be merged | 1,290 | 0.02 |
| All articles to be split | 803 | 0.01 |
| Unsorted Stubs | 6 | - |
| Stub categories | 19,674 | - |
| All uncategorized pages | 608 | 0.01 |
| All orphaned articles | 54,332 | 0.78 |
| All articles needing copy edit | 2,238 | 0.03 |
| All articles with style issues | 19,379 | 0.28 |
| All Wikipedia articles needing context | 2,769 | 0.04 |
| All articles that may contain original research | 16,580 | 0.24 |
Miscellaneous
[edit]| Category | Entries |
|---|---|
| Requested moves | 1,419 |
| All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes | 5,339 |
| All accuracy disputes | 15,816 |
| Articles with invalid ISBNs | 1 |
| Articles with invalid ISSNs | 2 |
| All articles to be expanded | 65,623 |
Special pages
[edit]| Maintenance reports | Information |
|---|---|
| Broken redirects | |
| Dead-end pages | Dead-end pages |
| Dormant pages | Dusty articles |
| DoubleRedirects | Double redirects |
| Lonely pages | Orphaned articles |
| Long pages | |
| New pages | New page patrol |
| New pages feed | Page curation |
| Protected pages | Protection policy |
| Short pages | |
| Uncategorized | Categorization |
| Uncategorized cats | |
| Uncategorized templates | |
| Unused categories | |
| Unused files (images) | |
| Unused templates | |
| Without interwiki links | |
| Most interwiki links |
Sub-page listing
[edit]Hong Kong
[edit]
Misc
[edit] Delete
|
 Keep
|
 Neutral
|
 Oppose
|
 Support
|
 Note
|
 Template
|
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Winhunter. |
| Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0 | ||
| I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides. | ||