Jump to content

Talk:Super Sentai

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ressha Sentai Tokkyuger

[edit]

Well looks like Ressha Sentai Tokkyuger is no longer a rumor. Official news finally confirmed the copyright registered by Toei just popped yesterday:http://www.tokyo-sports.co.jp/entame/entertainment/210034/ I'm still waiting for the confirmed designs next month and in this month's Hyper Hobby, whenever it will be released.BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 06:35, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's from today, though.—Ryulong (琉竜) 07:48, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed.--BlackGaia02 (talkpage if you dare) (talk) 11:34, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Super Sentai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Super Sentai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:14, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Super Sentai. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong Japanese Page for Super Sentai

[edit]

Last night I was discovered on the language pages that one of them, Japanese, has a very wrong article, in this case: Toei Advertising. Would you please replace that article (https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%B1%E6%98%A0%E3%82%A8%E3%83%BC%E3%82%B8%E3%82%A8%E3%83%B3%E3%82%B7%E3%83%BC) with this one (https://ja.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%82%B9%E3%83%BC%E3%83%91%E3%83%BC%E6%88%A6%E9%9A%8A%E3%82%B7%E3%83%AA%E3%83%BC%E3%82%BA)? 94-kun (talk) 17:46, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done at some point apparently. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia section

[edit]

The § Parody and homage section seems to be composed of unnecessary trivia. Am I mistaken? Any objections to removal? —96.8.24.95 (talk) 15:17, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:TRIVIA#Guidance said ``Trivia sections should not simply be removed from articles in all cases --Ans (talk) 05:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. What was worth keeping in this one? —96.8.24.95 (talk) 06:44, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting question

[edit]

Would those massive lists of series and movies work better as a table with a few columns? I might have a go at it if no one responds. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 03:52, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(same user as above) I gave it a go. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To improve rather that merge; article content does not determine notability. Klbrain (talk) 11:48, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be a good idea to merge the articles for the first fifteen series (pre-Power Rangers) into this page? They don’t seem to have much beyond in-universe and IMDb information, and since they seem unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it … makes sense to merge it. and I’m not sure any of them are individually WP:notable. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 19:18, 29 March 2021 (UTC) edited 04:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for suggesting that. I wonder what other have to say. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose They're all notable per WP:TVSHOW. Could they all use some work to reduce the WP:FANCRUFT? Sure, but that's not a relevant reason for merging. JPG-GR (talk) 01:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(same anon user as above) Likely to be notable isn’t the same thing as actually notable. It’s possible that each series individually had substantial coverage in Japanese-language RSes, and if such can be used to build respectable articles that aren’t just IMDb pages, I’m all for it. If not, well: the presence or absence of reliable sources is more definitive than the geographic range of the program's audience alone. All I know is that English-language sources have little to nothing to say about any series prior to Zyuranger, the basis for the first season of Power Rangers, and any suitable non-English sources that might be out there seem to have gone ignored for the past sixteen years.
Or to put it simply: If we don’t have anything to say about the series, we don’t need a dedicated article to say it. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 01:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that any of that refutes what I said. Reliable sources exist (you can reference the Japanese-language Wikipedia for a small sampling) and whether they've been "ignored for the past sixteen years" is not relevant as there is no deadline. JPG-GR (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that the existence of sources doesn’t really do us any good unless we use them. Build out the stubs, or merge them until we can. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 16:47, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, while it’s true there is no deadline, if it’s unlikely to be expanded within a reasonable amount of time, it often makes sense to merge it. After sixteen years, this does seem unlikely. —151.132.206.250 (talk) 16:54, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The Super Sentai series that are pre-Power Rangers are all notable as per WP:TVSHOW. I also think they all use some work to reduce the WP:FANCRUFT that is better suitable for RangerWiki on Fandom instead of on Wikipedia though the ones that have been adapted are filled with the fan cruft too. Pahiy (talk) 22:35, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Strongly oppose. The main reasoning seems to be "because it's all pre-Power Rangers", considering the emphasis in their initial post, which is just stupid and a biased towards the western franchise.--14.203.16.238 (talk) 07:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I’m not sure what you mean about emphasis, unless you thought I was emphasizing a MOS:MAJORWORK title by italicizing it? —151.132.206.250 (talk) 14:38, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It implies bias towards the western franchise, i.e. only the seasons that were adapted into Power Rangers are notable, is how I interpreted your emphasis in "pre-power rangers".--14.203.16.238 (talk) 07:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
(same user as nom) Did you mean parenthetical rather than emphasis? I emphasized nothing. It was a clarification, nothing more. And it is a fact that the use of Zyuranger as the basis for the American show generated more interest (resulting in more coverage) of that particular series in the English-speaking world than any previous one.
I say English-speaking because, at this point, I’m not fluent in any other languages. I don’t know if any individual early SS series was discussed to any great extent in Japanese or any other language. I do know that in English, Zyuranger was (directly because of the link with PR), and the ones before it were not. As I’ve said before, if we have significant non-English sources for those prior series—great, let’s use them! Why aren’t we? If we aren’t because we don’t, I’m not sure why we need standalone articles for them without any meaningful content.
I guess that’s what my stance boils down to. If we can’t say anything meaningful in an article, it doesn’t need to be its own article. —96.8.24.95 (talk) 04:23, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No. I meant emphasis. You made the point to single out the fact that most are pre-Power Rangers, which sounds like bias. So what if they're pre-Power Rangers? It shouldn't affect their notability. Also guess you would want Toqger, Zyuohger, Kyuranger, Lupin/Patranger, Ryusoulger, Kiramager, and Zenkaiger deleted as well. Heck, lets get rid of all the Kamen Rider series since a good 99% of it wasn't adapted into the west.
Just because no one is adding more info doesn't make it not notable. If someone wants to add info, they will. No need to get your knickers in a twist. And what more do you want added anyway? All the articles seems to have just the right amount of information without seeping into fandom territory.
That's a very subjective opinion. Just because what the articles entails right now aren't meaningful to you, doesn't mean they're not meaningful to others.--14.203.16.238 (talk) 10:10, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: They're notable TV shows.--Manaritsu (talk) 12:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: This article already has a good amount of sources and info, other sentai pages are largely the same. More out of universe info would be good, but I believe they can be found and used to expand the pages in a reasonable amount of time. BenTheDuelist (talk) 21:16, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Distribution

[edit]

Excuse me, went was their distribution section for Asia deleted? If it's not cited, a citation needed tag would have sufficed Suredeath (talk) 06:42, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seasons

[edit]
  • Super Sentai Strongest Battle (mini-series) is part of series and must be in table, not in spin-offs.
  • PR and Korean PR titles must be too, because it's not only adaptations, they use sentai materials in their series. Unregistered user ([[User:2404:7a80:c100:cf00:5c76:83fc:4dc5:ca94|2404:7a80:c100:cf00:5c76:83fc:4dc5:ca94) deleted this with this edit summary - non related fake info deleted . This is nonsense and vandalism. Lado85 (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Super_Sentai&oldid=1265581540"