Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

13 April 2025

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< April 12	April 14 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Ajdin Mujagić

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bosnian men's footballer with a short professional career lasted before moving to the second tier of Croatian football. The closest source that is not a transfer announcement is SportSport, but it only mentions his name in title. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Results breakdown of the 2025 Portuguese legislative election

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary. Article will, when the results are known, contain the same information as contained in the constituencies articles. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Portugal. Obi2canibe (talk) 11:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Slide (FBG Duck song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG. Affiliated with artist article deleted after nomination which was recreated. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Different Personalities

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RELIABILITY in terms of referenced sources. Connected to artist article deleted after nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:36, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dil Awaiz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable, independent sources found to establish notability. Article lacks verifiable coverage. Also not a notable article and failed basic WP:GNG. Recommended for delete. Mlkfrz4455 (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Pakistan. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This How I'm Coming 2

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RELIABILITY; affiliated with article of artist deleted following nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:35, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Big Clout

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks WP:MUSICBIO and WP:RELIABILITY. Also affiliated with article recreated third time following deletion by nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FBG Duck discography

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Connected to an article previously marked for deletion by nomination. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:12, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs and Music. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:34, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

FBG Duck

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreation of a previously deleted article by nomination. Violation of WP:ANYBIO, WP:NOTABILITY and WP:REFERENCE. DBrown SPS (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Illinois. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Before Tagging all my articles I created because it’s connected to the page FBG Duck, have you seen the 2nd nomination or do I have to show everything again. Momentoftrue (talk) 10:13, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You forgot one thing... WP:NOTABILITY. His notability and his notoriety isn't relevant or popular like various artists noted here. Yes, I know it's wrong to renominate after 4 days, but unfortunately, unless you can find something reliable enough to keep him here, then it is necessary to nominate FBG Duck for deletion again. DBrown SPS (talk) 11:47, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
didn’t you see the reliable sources and an gold riaa that’s what make notability XXL Magazine, AllMusic, HotNewHipHop, The Fader, Billboard, and Hypebeast and FBG Duck was placed number 15 on the billboard chart FBG Duck Billboard’s chart doesn’t that make WP:notability or I’m just tripping let me know. Momentoftrue (talk) 12:11, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
you might as well remove AfD for the other songs, albums, mixtapes, by FBG Duck. Momentoftrue (talk) 12:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Frank's Track

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; coverage mentioning this track is more about Wolves. Should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Info - Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it has been previously PROD'd (via summary).
--Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Plus: No-one at all even wants it deleted now. Not even the nominator. See also Illest Motherfucker Alive (AfD discussion). Uncle G (talk) 12:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hoodrat

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:30, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the song's appearance from Mike Tyson received significant coverage and even if the context is album reviews for discussion on the excerpt, these go into details and it charted in multiple countries. --K. Peake 08:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jail (song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:42, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there is much notability of the song's origins being discussed in background and the info around inclusion of "Pt 2", as well as Jay-Z's feature and chart positions are obviously not the be-all-end-all yet the song charted in so many countries these obviously have an affect on notability. --K. Peake 07:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Notable songs need to be the subject of multiple in-depth independent sources—album reviews do not count. Do you have sources that show this? WP:NSONG is explicit that charting is only a positive indicator that a search for significant coverage will be successful—charting history does not relax coverage standards for song notability. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 09:58, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in It

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are multiple articles discussing the context of Assassin's feature on this song, not Yeezus itself, multiple remixes, 1 this source is dedicated to the song and it charted in the US. --K. Peake 19:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That is the only source about this song. The guideline asks for multiple. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 19:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Illest Motherfucker Alive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

One of seven nominations by this nominator being pointlessly relisted today alone (Frank's Track (AfD discussion), Hoodrat (AfD discussion), Jail (song) (AfD discussion), I'm in It (AfD discussion), Illest Motherfucker Alive (AfD discussion), God Is (AfD discussion), Burn (¥$ song) (AfD discussion)) that are a waste of everyone's time because deletion is not requested either by the nominatior or by anyone else at all even after a week. This is Articles for deletion. If it does not involve the administrator deletion tool, this is not the place. Uncle G (talk) 12:49, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

God Is

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:50, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there are multiple sources outside of context of the album used in this article referencing the song or Labrinth's contributions, an additional version is noted and it charted in numerous countries. --K. Peake 17:43, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:06, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Burn (¥$ song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NSONG; should be redirected to its album. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ꧁Zanahary꧂ 01:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Toadspike [Talk] 08:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amir Makled

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTNEWS, subject is only known for one event, being detained a few days ago. A Wikipedia page can't possibly exist for every person who gets detained, the news reporting is typical and unless it somehow persists and this case gets bigger, WP:TOOSOON. jolielover♥talk 07:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Palestine, United States of America, and Michigan. jolielover♥talk 07:50, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lori Perkins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only independent sources I can find are ones that mention her in passing. Created over a declined AfC in 2015 by a single-purpose account editing about Perkins and her publishing company. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United States of America. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 04:30, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Businesspeople, Women, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:06, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obviously non-notable subject, promotional BLP. silviaASH (inquire within) 07:26, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but stubify. Underneath the promotional tone is a lot of important work in publishing award-winning Lesbian writers. The Lambda Literary Awards are the Pulitzers of queer writing, and her imprints have for over a dozen years published many notable women's literature, including Cecilia Tan. I don't know the subject, but I met Tan once or twice at SF Cons. Can I take a crack at this? Thanks for your patience. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2025 (UTC) P.S. I've started to work on it. Bearian (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2025 (UTC) P.P.S. I cut out what can't be sourced or is out of date, and added a source. I considered a merger but upon further reflection took it back. Discuss. Bearian (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as between the three book reviews, awards, and coverage about her agency and e-book house there seems to be enough for at least WP:NAUTHOR if not WP:BASIC. The article is a bit of a mess and would benefit from a re-write. Nnev66 (talk) 18:38, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:31, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:32, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Bilton

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article was created by a sockpuppet account named "Novonium", since blocked indefinitely, in 2012. The article appears to have a pretty rich editing history by socks, also since blocked, in the years following its creation. There is a strong WP:DENY argument to be made alone for deleting this article.

Additionally, most of the sources mention Nick Bilton in passing or refer to works of his but are not about the man himself. Therefore, though articles about some of Bilton's work might be notable, the subject matter BLP, Bilton, is himself not notable and the article should be deleted. Iljhgtn (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Journalism, England, and United States of America. Shellwood (talk) 16:12, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Some reviews of his books [1], [2], an article in Variety [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 17:59, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Source 10 is also a book review, this would likely pass AUTHOR with at least three book reviews in RS. Oaktree b (talk) 18:00, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What do you think of the WP:DENY rationale for deletion? I think it is likely that this person paid to have their article created, or did it themselves with a sock account. Either way, it has a rich history of editing by blocked sock accounts. Iljhgtn (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Meets WP:DIRECTOR/WP:CREATIVE as director/writer of a notable film, at least. -Mushy Yank. 18:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the criteria from those qualifies here? Iljhgtn (talk) 02:07, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...#3, most evidently. Bilton’s Fake Famous has received a lot of critical attention. Just check. WP: AUTHOR also applies. He is a very clearly notable writer and filmmaker. -Mushy Yank. 08:32, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
What are your thoughts on WP:DENY given the rich history of editing by socks and the fact that this article was created by a sock itself? I say delete and it could maybe then be recreated separately on that basis alone. Iljhgtn (talk) 13:17, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:31, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mehdi Golshani

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's no indication of notability as per WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. The subject probably passes WP:POLITICIAN as a former member of a legislative body SCCR, but it's good to reach a clearer consensus. Xpander (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Xpander (talk) 18:47, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep, WP:SK3. What is the point of starting an AfD when the nomination statement itself states that the subject probably passes a notability criterion, WP:NPOL? But for the record I think he also has a good case for WP:PROF #C2 (Templeton prize), #C3 (Academy of Sciences of Iran), and #C5 (distinguished professor), so the nomination claim of "no indication of notability" through academic notability is both a WP:VAGUEWAVE and completely erroneous. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein. As for #C5 I couldn't find any independent sources for the distinction claim. As for #C2 how is "winner of a course program" and a "former judge" notable? As for #C3 it has hundreds of members most of which are not notable. So I don't think it passes WP:PROF as suggested. Xpander (talk) 21:22, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- You're missing the point. Why would you nominate a former member of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution for deletion when you say yourself that it's enough for NPOL? People who are notable need only be notable for one thing; even if you don't believe he is notable as an academic, notability as a politician is enough. For that matter, he's also likely not notable as an athlete (because we have no record of any athletic accomplishments) nor as a musician (likewise); do you think that should be a valid rationale to delete someone notable as a politician? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:03, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  @David Eppstein I certainly respect your points. The issue with SCCR is that it is not a de jure legislative body, and if it is, it is not a common one, i.e. as compared to the US, UK etc. where the only legislature is the Congress/Parliament/Assembly. On their website they mention:
  
  The duties of the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution can be divided into three areas: policymaking, regulation development, and supervision^[1].
  
  So it doesn't say lawmaking specifically, although it is mentioned in their by-law, that in case of needing law-changes they can ask the corresponding body to provide the necessary arrangements:
  
  Article 32 - If the Supreme Council resolution requires a law, regulation, or resources to be implemented, the matter will be sent to the head of the relevant authority or the highest official of the relevant body for legal procedures to be carried out, in order to provide the necessary arrangements.^[2]
  
  So maybe it could be interpreted as an executive body rather than a legislative one? That's why I said probably. Some editors have rejected the notability claim based on membership of this body. So the rationale was to reach as clear a consensus as possible. Xpander (talk) 07:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "درباره شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.
^ "شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Ferrer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person. Doesn't meet WP:GNG because none of the sources discuss him as a person, but simply mention his job title and/or are articles writrten by him. The man himself has not received significant coverage. Doesn't meet WP:AUTHOR. Doesn't meat WP:ANYBIO. Amisom (talk) 18:53, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Journalism, and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 18:56, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, Television, Judaism, England, and Massachusetts. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete could not find any significant discussion about the subject in all of the references. Those passing mentions are not enough to pass for WP:ANYBIO. Mekomo (talk) 07:42, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Jewish News, where he is named as the editor. I can't find much coverage about him - the best sources would appear to be Britain's Jews: Confidence, Maturity, Anxiety [4], which has about 5 pages reporting on an interview with him, which says he is not religious, and the Spiegel International source in the article already, which gives his age at the time. I haven't found many sources which quote him, either (as distinct from publishing his writings) - the book Muslims Don't Matter [5] has a small para quoting one thing he wrote, but that seems to be about all. I don't see any status or achievements that would meet any notability criteria, either. RebeccaGreen (talk) 04:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:29, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Elena Avram

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not have enough coverage to meet WP:NSPORT requirements. Darkm777 (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Sportspeople. Darkm777 (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Not as clear notability as the others, but she was a world championship medalist and Olympedia includes a photo that looks recent from the Sportarad newspaper, which indicates that they likely covered her. What we have to do is find it. Its also quite likely there'd be further offline coverage, given her accomplishments took place before the internet. BeanieFan11 (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NSPORT does not state that Olympic Medal Winners are automatically qualified. Rowing does not have its own policy, but some sports such as Track & Field do and state that "Significant coverage is likely to exist for athletes who compete in the field of athletics if they meet any of the criteria below." One of the criteria is to have Top 8 placement in a major competition, but even then we need to have significant news coverage. Could you point me out to any specific policy that states Olympic medal winners automatically qualify? Darkm777 (talk) 02:18, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Where in my above comment did I say that Olympic Medal Winners are automatically qualified? BeanieFan11 (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No sports guideline grants automatic notability to anyone, but for what it's worth, Olympic medal winners are mentioned at WP:NOLY. Geschichte (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOLY states "Significant coverage is likely to exist." It doesn't say it is an automatic qualification. We still need significant coverage per the policies. Darkm777 (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Olympics, and Romania. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:18, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Best Regards (CP) 22:35, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To me the bronze medal at 1975 World Rowing Championships is a pretty clear indication of notability.BabbaQ (talk) 14:48, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Bergeron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can’t find any sources that aren’t connected to the subject. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, and Authors. ProtobowlAddict ^talk! 22:54, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
? What does the nominator think about the subject's citation record? It appears to contain hundreds of sources that are not connected to the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:26, 30 March 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per WP:PROF. I see three articles with over 500 citations, a fourth with 478, and more articles with over 100 citations. That appears to pass the PROF Test. Plus, while Harvard cheats at hockey, the medical school is sort of prestigious. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can we confirm that he's actually a Harvard professor? Not all self-described "teaching at Harvard" is prestigious. --Jahaza (talk) 17:27, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm pretty sure that info is out of date. Note that most of his books were published between 2001-2003, and we have so far articles from 2007-2019. We won't be able to include his teaching unless we find some actual biographical info. He can meet NAUTHOR or NACADEMIC on the basis of his writings alone, although that isn't satisfying as an article. Lamona (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Article has been here since 2005. The article is just one line and one weak source. Ramos1990 (talk) 22:27, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Ramos1990, that has nothing to do with whether the subject is notable or not. -- asilvering (talk) 16:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:31, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I see at least 2000 reliable sources not connected to the subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:44, 5 April 2025 (UTC).[reply]
Weak delete. It is a bit of a red flag to me how low his ratio of book reviews to books is. I found only two reviews, from many books, and one of the two is in a journal I think may be dubious: [6] [7]. That's not enough for WP:AUTHOR for me and I don't think his citation record is strong enough for WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:18, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added a list of his books and a few articles. His books get hundreds of cites (905, 690, 620 ...). I did not find bio information (yet) and the one reference that is there from business wire is a press release. I did find an interview. I still think he passes NAUTHOR and possibly NACADEMIC. Lamona (talk) 23:35, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:26, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Logodaedaly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An extended dictionary definition. Includes a number of quotations, a couple of which are already in the perfectly good Wiktionary entry, and some usage notes, but no indication of significant coverage of the word itself as a subject. Search engine results are largely dictionary definitions and lists of unusual words. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Opus 113 (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Farooq (book)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I removed some unverified and unsourced content from the page. It was already a stub, and now it's even shorter. Deletion seems to be the most appropriate option.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and India. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 01:05, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:15, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are some references on the Uzbek wiki (uz:Al-faruq) that look promising, but I can only access this one. ~~I've added some context. It could be notable; I lean towards keep.~~ I realized that those sources are considered unreliable by the nominator who removed them recently. Would be useful to know why they are unreliable, but I trust your judgment since I can't read them. Recon rabbit 19:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Reconrabbit: I initially added the sources while working on the Bibliography of Shibli Nomani. Although they are reliable, they are not directly relevant to the text, which is why I chose to remove them. However, if you find them useful, you're welcome to incorporate them. There is no shortage of credible sources available online. The primary concern is that, in its current state, this article does not meet the standards required for a standalone entry.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 20:19, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The linked source from the Journal of Islamic Studies and Humanities dedicates about two pages to this book, which led me to believe it was worthwhile to use it. If it does not meet the standards for an article on a book, it could be redirected back to Shibli Nomani until someone compiles more substantial information. Recon rabbit 20:38, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:14, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ma'ariful Qur'an

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been tagged for original research, unreliable sources, and unverified content since 2018. Although I have attempted to address these concerns, the article remains poorly sourced and lacks sufficient content to stand as a standalone page. I propose a redirect.–𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Islam, and Pakistan. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the nom, as the page does not have verifiable sources. --Mozzcircuit (talk) 16:11, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Redirect as proposed by nom or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Youth Service America

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article lacks notability - specifically, reliable, secondary sources that are not just interviews. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Washington, D.C.. WormEater13 (talk) 02:28, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As the nominator says, its the article that lacks citations, not the organization that lacks notability. I have added a half-dozen citations from reliable 3rd party sources and will continue to work on it until the nominator is satisfied. Freechild (talk) 19:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large majority of the new sources that you've added to the article are interviews with individuals closely connected to the subject, and upon searching for notable sources about the subject, I can only seem to find primary sources. There's also many citations that you've added that don't have URLs. For example, one source you linked is the CEO of Youth Service America (Steve Culbertson) announcing that he will be speaking at his alma mater for a keynote, which is a clear connection to the subject, and is also not related to Youth Service America. WormEater13 (talk) 12:51, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unable to find the necessary coverage to show WP:NORG is met here. All I can find are interviews with the leader and press releases. Let'srun (talk) 01:14, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - it’s the article that needs citations, not inherently the organisation. OMGShay 92 (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fiona Foster

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sign of notability, search returns nothing. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and United Kingdom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 01:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Journalism, Radio, and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:01, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: Have added two references but the article still needs additional references.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rillington (talk • contribs) 16:09, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep, on the basis that she fronted (as a main or co-host) several TV programmes, especially during the 90s and has been a reporter/presenter in various others. Had difficulty in finding much in the way of WP:SIGCOV specifically about her, although plenty of mentions of programmes/episodes she has been part of, or been the lead reporter in. I have added a ref for the 1993 'Missing' TV series, which does also discuss her personally (career and personal life) aside from the programme. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 12:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Aziz Abdul Kareem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined prod with no attempt to add additional sources. Lacking third party in-depth coverage to meet WP:SPORTSCRIT. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, Sport of athletics, and Kuwait. LibStar (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Chow Park Wing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG, with only database sources in the article. All I could find about this Olympian through multiple searches was a article from historian Paul Tchir, noting that while Wing participated in the Olympics nothing else is currently known about him, with not even a date of birth available. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Myanmar. Let'srun (talk) 04:07, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Qaeda safe houses, Kabul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Random hodgepodge of references to random locations. Fails WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and utterly lacks focused WP:SIGCOV to establish WP:RS. Longhornsg (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Terrorism, Afghanistan, and United States of America. Longhornsg (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Aw Chu Kee

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject lacks the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG, with only database sources in the article. All I could find about this Olympian through multiple searches was a article from historian Paul Tchir, noting that the fact that Kee participated in the Olympics but very little is known about any other aspect of his life. A redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics may be a suitable WP:ATD. Let'srun (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Myanmar. Let'srun (talk) 03:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Weightlifting – As WP:ATD. Svartner (talk) 05:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Burma at the 1956 Summer Olympics#Weightlifting per Svartner as an acceptable ATD for this non notable sports person. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 12:20, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gregorio Sena

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability for this early century footballer. I dug through some Spanish archives and found some trivial mentions in publications like Mundo Deportivo (1), La Vanguardia (1), La Patria (1), Gran Vida (1), Sport (1, 2, 3), El Mundo (1), Heraldo Deportivo (1), and El Sol (1), but never anything approaching WP:SIGCOV. Seems like a WP:SPORTCRIT fail. JTtheOG (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Spain. JTtheOG (talk) 02:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:05, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - clearly a notable figure in the pioneering days of Spanish football, WP:COMMONSENSE applies given his career, the online sources, and the clear availability of offline sources. Giant Snowman 12:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per GiantSnowman. Svartner (talk) 12:54, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spicule (glass manufacture)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find any significant coverage in independent, reliable sources Iban14mxl (talk) 00:37, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:01, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I moved some info to the glass flakes article. The Spicule article can be deleted as it has no citations and fails WP:N. TurboSuperA+_(connect) 06:41, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Shine On (Jet song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable song. 0 coverage in sources. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music, and United Kingdom. WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:09, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect: For the most part all non-notable songs can be redirected to albums, and non-notable albums can be redirected to band/musician page. This one can be redirected to Shine On (Jet album). LastJabberwocky (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above reason. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 08:55, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I've added references - clearly satisfies the requirements of WP:NSONG - charted internationally and has featured in numerous television shows. Dan arndt (talk) 08:28, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:24, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral history of Jitendra Chaudhury

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, not a notable national-level leader, detailed history is already merged with the article Jitendra Chaudhury. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 00:03, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 13. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:18, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, History, Lists, and Tripura. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:17, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Duplicate of content at Jitendra Chaudhury#Electoral history. No need for separate article. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:30, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "درباره شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

[2] "شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی". sccr.ir. Retrieved 2025-04-06.

[1]

[2]