Talk:Big Five personality traits

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Big Five personality traits article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 12 months

Psychology High‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology High‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Neuroticism

Last full paragraph in this section has no real source. Can we find a source for this last sentence? Gracepel (talk) 02:18, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Highly Objectionable and Unsupported reversal of Agreeableness

critical/rational as the opposite of friendly/compassionate is certainly wrong, telling, and unsupported. I suggest replacing rational with judgmental which is what's in Agreeableness. Lycurgus (talk) 07:00, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ty Lycurgus (talk) 14:35, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Comparative Management Seminar

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 January 2024 and 20 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Samory Loukakou, Anaelle Bertolino-Radu, YI-AN, CHUANG (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Soomin974.

— Assignment last updated by Luca Vieten (talk) 22:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed article

I reviewed the article and noticed that it is informative and easy to understand. I liked how it has different areas where to learn more about the different traits in the model, it makes it easy to follow and the history was relevant. I think this article would benefit from everyday examples and what this model is used in the real world, this could help the model be used more frequently, but overall i thihk the article is well written but it's a good article. Isizamora (talk) 12:52, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why So Little Edits?

For the claims that the Big 5 makes and reproducibility of findings comparative to the rest of the field of psychology it seems like this article deserves more edits. I'm new to wiki editing. Is there a place where we can nominate or rank articles to increase attention? MindSprout (talk) 22:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]